Philosophical foundations of collective practices of modernity
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
From a philosophical perspective, the author looks at the foundations of collective practices in the modern world and analyses the specifics of the new, global level of problems in social being. The author emphasizes the role of constructivist methodology in transforming objects of state architectonics and in addition substantiates the significance of the concepts of dialogism, relativism and pragmatism as applied to forms of self-organization. The analysis has identified points of growth for addressing a wide range of issues in social practice. Finally, the link between consolidation of efforts and resources have been outlined.

Keywords:
collective practices, consolidation, dialogism, constructivism, relativism, pragmatism, resources, intelligence, social being, world order, methodology
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Alexeyeva Tatiana A. “Think Like Constructivist: Discovering a Polyphonic World”. Sravnitel’naya politika = Comparative Politics Russia 5.1 (2014): 4—21. (In Russian).

2. Gordeev I. “Specific Features of the Global Policy in the Post-Modern Era”. Vlast’ = The Authority 3 (2008): 79—82. (In Russian).

3. Grebenyuk A. A. “Information and Psychological Security and Simulacrization of Science in a Modern Transitive Society”. Chelovek — Priroda — Obshchestvo: Teoriya i praktika bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel’nosti, ekologii i valeologii 6 (13) (2020):15—21. (In Russian).

4. Dzhokhadze Igor. “Pragmatism and War”. Istoriya filosofi i = History of Philosophy 20.1 (2015): 193—214. (In Russian).

5. Kazantsev A. A. “ ‘Constructivist Revolution’, or About the Role of Cultural and Civilizational Factors in the Modern Theory of International Relations”. Politicheskaya nauka = Political Science (RU) 4 (2009): 88—114. (In Russian).

6. Kosarev A. V., Volf M. N. “Joseph Margolis’s Neo-Pragmatism”. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals 2.2 (32) (2017): 3—16. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2017-2.2-3-16

7. Kochergin Albert N. “The Role of Dialogism Concept in the Civilization’s Fortune (M. M. Bakhtin, M. Buber, K. Jaspers)”. Gumanitariy: aktual’nyye problemy gumanitarnoy nauki i obrazovaniya = Russian Journal of the Humanities 2 (38) (2017): 45—52. (In Russian).

8. Lantsov S. A. “The Carribean Missile Crisis in International Relations of the XXth Century: Theoretical and Practical-Political Aspects”. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS = Political Expertise: POLITEX 9.2 (2013): 131—136. (In Russian).

9. Ravochkin Nikita N., Knyazev Nikolai A., Kruglova Inna N., Leopa Aleksandr V., Shtumpf Svetlana P. “The Problem of Ideas in the Context of Social Constructivism”. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke = Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being 9.3A (2020): 148—157. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.37.41.017

10. Soboleva M. E. “On Possibility of Dialog Between Cultures”. Voprosy filosofii 3 (2009): 147—157. (In Russian).

11. Tumanova O. I. “Political Representation and Representative Democracy in the Philosophy of F. Ankersmith”. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya = Herald of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy 1 (59) (2022): 216—223. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26456/vtphilos/2022.1.216

Login or Create
* Forgot password?