employee
Russian Federation
UDC 159.923.2
The author argues that human cognition, while having common conditions of generation, also has a common underlying problematic around which the objects of all its specific areas revolve, without exception. The historical evolution of the functional role of science in society is considered. The connection between the problem of totality and the intense societal need for the individual to reflect on his or her freedom, which is expressed in a variety of political concepts, is demonstrated. The gnosiological roots of the concept of totalitarianism are revealed, the we/I ratio is analyzed and its connection with the contradiction of continuous and discrete, which goes back to the dialectic of the One and the Many, is shown. The author makes it clear that individual Self, stripped of its own definitions in a society of advanced commodity production, is found to be fragmented, despite the increasing continuity of the chains of material production in which it is included as an agent. This fragmentation serves as the basis for the self-awareness of the Self as an abstract One (das Eins). A solution to the problem of totality in the form of a dialectical project of a unified concept of fractality, conceptualized as a logical category, has been proposed.
dialectics, Marx, fractality, Hegel, totality, personality, human and society
1. Baudrillard J. La Transparence du Mal, essai sur les phénomènes extrêmes. Paris : Galilée, 1990. 208 p. (In French.)
2. Burik M. L. Man and Economy in a Virtualized World. Moscow: Agrar Media Grup, 2016. 268 p. (In Russian).
3. Jameson F. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. N. p.: Duke University Press, 1991. 461 p.
4. Dzhokhadze I. “Mass Society and Democratic Totalitarianism: Freedom without Choice”. Logos 5 (50) (2005): 165—178. (In Russian).
5. Ilyenkov E. V. “Dialectics of the Ideal”. Logos 1 (69) (2009): 6—62. (In Russian).
6. Morozov M. Yu. “The Concept of ‘Fractality’ as a Logical Category”. Problemy onto-gnoseologicheskogo obosnovaniya matematicheskikh i yestestvennykh nauk: collection of scientific works. Chief ed. E. I. Arepiev. Kursk State University. Iss. 11. Kursk, 2020. 65—75. (In Russian).
7. Morozov M. Yu. “The Contradiction of Continuity and Discreteness as the Essential Definition of the Fractal”. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Education 5 (2021): 9—22. (In Russian).
8. Jaspers K. Die geistige Situation der Zeit. Vierte Auflage. Berlin, Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1932. 191 S. (In German).
9. Siemek M. „Poznanie jako praktyka (Prolegomena do przyszłej epistemologii)“ . Marksizm w kulturze fi lozofi cznej XX wieku. Red. M. J. Siemek. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988. 9—24. (In Polish).
10. Sobotka M. Člověk a práce v německé klasické filosofii. Praha: Nakl. polit. lit., 1964. 152 s. (In Czech).
