employee
Russian Federation
UDC 334.027
UDC 331.1
The author considers the management of innovative development of a mining enterprise. The position is substantiated that the most important factor having a negative impact on the effectiveness of the management of the enterprise’s innovative activity is the lack of management tools that ensure a balance of social and economic interests of its subjects. A theoretical model based on the provisions of the theory of marginal utility and providing the definition of a dynamic balance of interests, and a complex of economic and mathematical models that provide strategic management of the balance of interests are proposed. The conclusion has been made about the applicability of the proposed methodological approaches and management tools for the management of a mining enterprise based on the balance of interests of shareholders and staff.
mining enterprise, development management, sustainable development, management entity, innovation, innovative development, socio-economic development, personnel, owner, balance of interests, mathematical modeling in economics
1. Deming W. Edward. The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994. 247 p.
2. Kaplan A. V. “Economic and Technological Principles of the Implementation of Innovative Activities at Enterprises”. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow 10.10A (2020): 141—149. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.24.17.014 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZBWHBT.
3. Kaplan A. V., Baev I. A., Tereshina M. A. Management of Social and Economic Development of a Mining Enterprise in the Context of Systemic Unity: monograph. Chelyabinsk: SUSU Publ. Center, 2021. 205 p., ill., chart. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ERBGTQ.
4. Klinov V. “Upheaval in the Distribution of Power in the World Economy: Problems and Outlook of the World Economy to 2050”. Voprosy Ekonomiki 7 (2017): 114—127. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-7-114-127 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WNNPJP.
5. Kostarev A. S. Coal Mining Production Association Innovative Development Strategy Generation under Conditions of Technological Modes Change: extended abstract of Dr. Sci. (Econ.) diss. Chelyabinsk, 2020. 40 p. (In Russian).
6. Kuhn Thomas A. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. With introd. essay by Ian Hacking. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2012. 264 p.
7. Labutin A. V., Graftseva K. A. “Globalization and Problems of the World Economy at the Turn of 21st Century”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 3 (11) (2001): 47—55. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SCVVNL.
8. Roslyakov S. V. “Labor Productivity as a Factor in Increasing the Competitiveness and Viability of Mining Enterprises”. Izvestiâ Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta = News of the Ural State Mining University 2 (70) (2023): 128—133. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21440/2307-2091-2023-2-128-133 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVDWUL.
9. Trigubovich L. G. “General Characteristics in Innovation Policies of Countries Under Modern Conditions”. Mirovaya ekonomika i biznes-administrirovanie malykh i srednikh predpriyatiy: materialy 17-go Mezhdunar. nauch. seminara, provodimogo v ramkakh 19-y Mezhdunar. nauch.-tekhn. konf. “Nauka — obrazovaniyu, proizvodstvu, ekonomike” (25—26 mar. 2021, Minsk, Republic of Belarus). Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika, 2021. 107—108. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EUSJZX.
10. Bagdasar’yan I. S., Vorozhbit E. G., Vyskrebentseva A. S. et al. Economic Growth: Factors of Efficient Development: monograph. Publ. ed. G. Yu. Gulyaev. Penza: Nauka i prosveshchenie, 2017. 110 p. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZEFDST.
11. Kilin A. B., Azev V. A., Kostarev A. S., Baev I. A., Galkina N. V. Effective Development of a Coal Mining Production Association: Practice and Methods. Ed. V. B. Artemiev. Moscow: Gornaya kniga, 2019. 276 p. (In Russian).
12. Anderson R. W., Bustamante M. C., Guibaud S., Zervos M. “Agency, Firm Growth, and Managerial Turnover”. The Journal of Finance 73.1 (2018): 419—464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12583
13. Zemtsov Stepan, Kotsemir Maxim. “An Assessment of Regional Innovation System Efficiency in Russia: the Application of the DEA Approach”. Scientometrics 120.2 (2019): 375—404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03130-y
14. Zhu John Y. “Myopic Agency”. The Review of Economic Studies 85.2 (2018): 1352—1388. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx034
